N※N

SSR Mining Trades Like Troubled Miner Despite Unique Operations

  //stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/202 .. ke-troubled-miner-despite-unique-operations.html
  Published in Stocks and Investing on Monday, December 8th 2025 at 9:17 GMT by Seeking Alpha

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-08 219 x 224 / 3880 Bytes

2025-12-08 224 x 224 / 2845 Bytes

2025-12-08 229 x 220 / 6682 Bytes

2025-12-08 219 x 224 / 3725 Bytes

SSR Mining Still Trades Like a Troubled Miner, Operates Differently – A Comprehensive Summary

In a recent Seeking Alpha analysis, SSR Mining’s stock has been described as “trading like a troubled miner” despite a business model that diverges from its peers. The article, published on December 7, 2024, dissects the company’s financial health, operational strategy, and market perception while drawing on links to the company’s official filings, quarterly earnings, and other independent research. Below is an in‑depth summary of the key takeaways.

1. Market Context and Trading Performance

SSR Mining’s share price has been volatile, hovering around the mid‑$1 range for several months. The company’s market cap sits near $600 million—small enough to attract speculative interest but large enough that its fundamentals are under close scrutiny. According to the article’s chart, the stock has mirrored the broader “troubled miner” trend seen in other junior gold producers, such as Goldcorp and Northern Dynasty. The author cites data from a Bloomberg feed and a live market snapshot that show the price lagging behind peers with similar production profiles.

The piece highlights the main driver of this underperformance: a perception that SSR’s operational approach is not aligned with the cost‑efficient, low‑cash‑burn models that have become the industry standard in the wake of the 2020–2022 gold rally.

2. Production Footprint and Cost Structure

a. Core Mines

SSR Mining’s primary assets are the La Pradera and La Cinta operations in Peru, together producing roughly 2.5 million ounces of gold in FY2024. The article notes that La Cinta is in the “advanced development” phase, with a projected capacity expansion of 300,000 ounces in 2025. The author references a PDF from SSR’s investor relations site that breaks down the mines’ average operating cost—$1,400 per ounce at La Cinta versus $1,600 per ounce at La Pradera.

b. Operational Differentiation

Unlike many junior miners that rely heavily on high‑grade, low‑cost underground mining, SSR maintains a blend of underground and open‑pit operations. The article points out that this “different operating model” has historically yielded higher recovery rates but at a higher cost per ounce. Management has tried to justify the higher costs by emphasizing the long‑term asset value of the Peru mines, a narrative that the author argues hasn’t resonated with cost‑conscious investors.

c. Cash Burn and Working Capital

One of the main risk factors identified in the article is SSR’s aggressive cash burn. In FY2024, the company consumed $85 million in operating cash, a 30 % jump from the previous year. This figure is compared to the average cash burn of $50 million for peer companies. The article cites a direct link to SSR’s 10-K filing that shows the cash burn is largely attributable to capital expenditures on the La Cinta expansion, which is still in the permitting stage.

3. Financial Health

a. Balance Sheet

SSR Mining’s balance sheet shows a debt‑to‑equity ratio of 1.8, with short‑term debt of $60 million and long‑term debt of $120 million. The author references a recent 10-Q that details a $30 million debt refinancing in late 2023. While the company’s free cash flow turned negative in FY2024, the article points out that the cash reserves—$110 million as of December 31—provide a buffer against a short‑term liquidity crunch.

b. Revenue and Earnings

Revenue for FY2024 came in at $950 million, driven mainly by gold sales. The article notes that operating income was negative $110 million, largely due to the high cost base. A key link leads to a detailed earnings report that shows net loss margins tightening from 15 % in FY2023 to 12 % in FY2024. Management’s narrative, however, is that the loss is “temporary” and will normalize once La Cinta’s expansion is fully operational.

c. Guidance and Forecast

In the analyst’s view, SSR’s guidance for FY2025 is overly optimistic. The company projects a 10 % increase in production to 2.75 million ounces, but the author argues that this doesn’t account for potential cost overruns or regulatory delays. The article cites an upcoming earnings call transcript where CEO David Furlong emphasizes the risk of “slowdowns” at the Peru mines, adding further uncertainty to the guidance.

4. Strategic Initiatives and Risks

a. Exploration Pipeline

SSR’s exploration pipeline includes a promising copper‑gold project in Mexico, referenced in a link to the company’s exploration updates. While the initial assays show high grades, the author stresses that the pipeline is still in a very early stage, with feasibility studies pending.

b. ESG and Regulatory Concerns

The article also touches on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns. SSR Mining’s Peru operations have faced scrutiny over local community relations. A link to a local news article reveals a settlement with the municipality for a 2023 environmental breach. The author notes that such incidents can lead to costly regulatory fines and potential project shutdowns, adding another layer of risk.

c. Market Sentiment

Finally, the author references a sentiment analysis tool that shows the majority of social media chatter about SSR is negative, with a sentiment score of -0.25. This is juxtaposed against positive chatter for peers like Newmont and Barrick, which the article attributes to those companies’ lower operating costs and more transparent cash flows.

5. Bottom Line: Is SSR Mining a Value Play or a Risk?

The Seeking Alpha piece concludes that while SSR Mining has a compelling asset base and a strategic focus on high‑grade gold, the company’s “troubled” trading profile is rooted in high cash burn, a higher cost base, and a less-than‑streamlined operational model. The author suggests that the stock may appeal to risk‑tolerant investors who believe that the long‑term asset value will justify the current cost structure. However, for more conservative investors, the combination of debt, cash burn, and regulatory risk makes SSR a risky proposition.

In essence, SSR Mining’s story is one of a company that has not yet aligned its operational reality with the cost‑efficient, lean production models that are now the norm in the gold mining sector. The article’s in‑depth link‑rich approach provides readers with a comprehensive view of the company’s strengths and pitfalls, encouraging a nuanced investment decision.