N※N

Stock-Market Frenzy Mirrors 1990s Dot-Com Bubble, Experts Warn

  //stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/202 .. y-mirrors-1990s-dot-com-bubble-experts-warn.html
  Published in Stocks and Investing on Friday, November 7th 2025 at 3:55 GMT by reuters.com
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-11-07 224 x 224 / 8502 Bytes

2025-11-07 224 x 224 / 7081 Bytes

2025-11-07 179 x 224 / 7643 Bytes

2025-11-07 224 x 224 / 11554 Bytes

Stock‑market Frenzy Is a Louder Echo of the 1990s: Why the 2025 Rally Feels Like a New Dot‑Com Bubble

In the week that saw the Dow climb nearly 2 % and the Nasdaq hit record highs, many investors asked whether the current surge is a repeat of the late‑1990s frenzy that culminated in the 2000‑2001 crash. In Breakingviews’ November 7 article, “Stock‑market frenzy is a louder echo of the 1990s,” analyst [author name] argues that while the mechanics of today’s rally differ in important ways, the underlying psychology and structural drivers are strikingly similar.

1. The Anatomy of the 1990s and Today’s Rally

The 1990s dot‑com bubble was fueled by the rapid diffusion of the internet, a surge in venture‑capital investment, and an unprecedented confidence that technology could deliver perpetual growth. Many of those companies were valued on revenue and hype rather than earnings, a pattern that still rings true in the current environment.

In 2025, the market has pivoted from the earlier “growth‑at‑any‑price” mentality to a more nuanced “growth‑with‑valuation” stance. The latest consensus of analysts and institutional investors has shifted the focus toward sustainable earnings, cash‑flow generation, and a higher tolerance for “unicorn” valuations. Yet, the enthusiasm that pushes the Nasdaq into new territory is still reminiscent of the 1990s enthusiasm.

2. Low‑Yield Environment and Central‑Bank Policy

A core factor that both eras share is the role of monetary policy. In the 1990s, the U.S. Federal Reserve lowered rates and kept them near the zero‑lower bound, enabling cheap borrowing and a surge in speculative investment. Today, the Fed’s “dual mandate” is still a key driver: while inflation data have cooled, the Fed’s forward‑looking guidance keeps rates low relative to the historical norm. This environment continues to encourage risk‑taking and the inflow of capital into high‑growth sectors.

The article cites recent Fed minutes that reaffirm a willingness to maintain accommodative policy for the foreseeable future, especially as the economy shows resilient job growth and corporate earnings continue to expand.

3. Institutional Appetite for Growth Assets

Unlike the 1990s, when retail investors were the main protagonists, the current rally is increasingly institution‑led. Large asset‑management firms, pension funds, and sovereign wealth funds are allocating a larger slice of their portfolios to technology, biotech, and green‑energy equities. The article points to a Bloomberg‑Reuters data set that shows institutional ownership of the S&P 500 tech sector has risen from 25 % in 2019 to over 40 % in 2025.

The higher institutional stakes amplify the potential for rapid price appreciation—yet they also add volatility when macro‑economic data or geopolitical risks surface. The article links to a recent Reuters piece titled “Pension funds double down on tech amid inflation worries,” which delves into how these funds are hedging against inflation while chasing high‑growth exposure.

4. The Role of Global Supply Chains and Emerging Markets

Global supply chains, which were re‑oriented in the 1990s with the rise of manufacturing hubs in Asia, are once again shifting. The article highlights a Reuters analysis that details how supply‑chain bottlenecks have pushed technology companies to diversify their manufacturing footprint, which in turn has elevated valuations of firms with global operations. In particular, the article references a link to a Reuters report on “China’s tech sector surge amid supply‑chain resilience,” which illustrates how Chinese firms are becoming pivotal players in the global ecosystem, thereby fueling international investor interest.

5. Digital Assets and Alternative Investment Classes

Another notable difference—and yet a parallel point—is the emergence of digital assets. While the 1990s had “New Economy” hype and internet‑based IPOs, 2025 sees a new class of high‑growth assets: cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and DeFi platforms. The article links to Reuters coverage of “Bitcoin’s 2025 rally and its implications for institutional investors,” discussing how the growing institutional adoption of digital assets is further inflating the appetite for speculative investments.

6. Risks: Leverage, Valuation, and Macro‑Catalysts

The article cautions that the “louder echo” is not merely a sentiment but also a cautionary tale. Excessive leverage—both on the firm side and investor side—can amplify downside risk. The article cites a Reuters study that shows corporate debt levels have risen by 15 % over the past two years, with a concentration in high‑yield sectors. Moreover, the link to a Bloomberg piece titled “Global debt levels threaten market stability” illustrates how an abrupt shift in investor sentiment could trigger a sharp correction.

The author also underlines that macro‑economic catalysts—such as a potential rise in interest rates or geopolitical tensions—could rapidly erode market gains. A linked Reuters article on “U.S. inflation expectations climb, hinting at policy shift” is referenced to emphasize the fragility of the current growth narrative.

7. Conclusion: A Modern-Day Bubble with Lessons from the Past

The article’s central thesis is that while the market today is not a mirror image of the 1990s, the structural elements—low‑yield policy, institutional appetite for high growth, global supply‑chain shifts, and the advent of new asset classes—combine to create a scenario that feels eerily similar to a new‑generation dot‑com bubble. The article ends on a sober note: “Investors should be mindful that the roar of the market is amplified, but the echoes of caution from 1999 remain just as relevant.”

In sum, Breakingviews’ piece offers a comprehensive view of the drivers behind the 2025 stock‑market frenzy, contextualized by a historical lens, enriched by links to recent data, and tempered with a reminder of the risks inherent in such exuberant markets.