N※N

Oracle Shares Plunge: Worst Quarter in Decades as AI Doubts Mount

45

  //stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/202 .. worst-quarter-in-decades-as-ai-doubts-mount.html
  Published in Stocks and Investing on Sunday, December 28th 2025 at 10:43 GMT by New York Post

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-28 224 x 224 / 8761 Bytes

2025-12-19 179 x 224 / 13896 Bytes

2025-12-19 179 x 224 / 7860 Bytes

2025-12-28 185 x 224 / 9352 Bytes

Oracle Shares Plummet as AI Investment Doubts Fuel Worst Quarter in Decades

Oracle, the sprawling enterprise software giant, is facing a severe market reckoning. Its shares are poised to experience their worst quarterly performance since 2001, according to reports, fueled by growing investor anxieties surrounding its aggressive investments in artificial intelligence and questions about the company’s ability to effectively monetize those efforts. The situation highlights a broader trend of AI hype meeting reality checks within the tech sector, particularly for established players attempting to pivot into this rapidly evolving landscape.

The New York Post article details how Oracle's stock has fallen by over 25% since early November, wiping out billions in market capitalization. This dramatic decline isn’t solely attributable to broader market volatility; it’s directly linked to a series of events and pronouncements that have eroded investor confidence. At the heart of the issue lies Oracle’s ambitious plan to build its own AI cloud infrastructure, dubbed "Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)," designed to compete with industry leaders like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform.

The AI Bet: A Massive Investment & Uncertain Returns

Oracle's CEO Larry Ellison has been vocal about the company’s commitment to AI, envisioning OCI as a central hub for developers and businesses seeking cutting-edge AI capabilities. The strategy involves building massive data centers equipped with Nvidia’s powerful GPUs – a significant investment costing billions of dollars. Ellison believes that Oracle's unique approach, which includes offering both infrastructure and software, will differentiate it from competitors who primarily focus on just one aspect. He has also repeatedly emphasized the importance of AI in driving future growth for the company.

However, investors are now questioning whether this bet is paying off. The initial enthusiasm surrounding Ellison’s pronouncements has been tempered by a lack of concrete evidence demonstrating substantial customer adoption and revenue generation from OCI's AI services. The Post article highlights concerns that Oracle’s AI offerings aren’t gaining traction fast enough to justify the enormous capital expenditure.

Key Concerns Driving the Sell-Off:

Several specific factors have contributed to the stock’s downward spiral:

• Weakened Guidance & Q2 Earnings Report: Oracle's most recent quarterly earnings report, released in early December, exacerbated concerns. While revenue grew modestly, the company's guidance for future growth was significantly lower than analysts’ expectations. This signaled a slowdown in overall business performance and cast doubt on the AI strategy's ability to compensate for it. The Post notes that Ellison attempted to downplay the concerns, emphasizing long-term potential, but the damage was already done.
• Concerns About Nvidia Dependency: Oracle's reliance on Nvidia GPUs is another point of vulnerability. While Nvidia has benefited immensely from the AI boom, its stock price has also experienced volatility recently. Any disruption in GPU supply or a significant increase in their cost could severely impact Oracle’s ability to execute its AI strategy and maintain competitive pricing.
• Questionable "AI" Marketing: Some analysts argue that Oracle is overstating the “AI-ness” of some of its offerings. While OCI incorporates AI capabilities, critics suggest it's often repackaging existing services with an AI label rather than offering truly groundbreaking innovations. This perception risks damaging Oracle’s credibility and alienating potential customers. The article references reports suggesting that a significant portion of the "AI" workloads on OCI are actually using open-source models like Meta's Llama, raising questions about Oracle's value proposition.
• Competition & Market Saturation: The AI cloud market is becoming increasingly crowded and competitive. While Oracle has established strengths in enterprise software, breaking into the highly competitive cloud infrastructure space requires significant investment and a differentiated offering – something that some analysts believe Oracle hasn’t yet convincingly demonstrated. The existing dominance of AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud makes it difficult for any newcomer to gain substantial market share quickly.
• Ellison's Influence & Communication Style: Ellison’s continued involvement in strategic decision-making and his often bombastic communication style are also contributing factors. While he remains a respected figure by some, others view his pronouncements as overly optimistic and potentially misleading, further fueling investor skepticism.

Beyond Oracle: A Broader Trend?

Oracle's struggles aren't occurring in isolation. They reflect a broader trend of investors re-evaluating the AI hype cycle and scrutinizing companies’ ability to translate AI investments into tangible financial results. Many tech firms have been aggressively pursuing AI initiatives, but the path to profitability remains unclear for many. This has led to increased scrutiny from analysts and a more cautious approach from investors.

Looking Ahead:

Oracle faces an uphill battle to regain investor confidence. The company needs to demonstrate concrete progress in its AI strategy – not just through ambitious pronouncements but through measurable customer adoption, revenue growth, and clear differentiation from competitors. The coming quarters will be crucial for Oracle as it attempts to navigate the challenges of the AI revolution and prove that its massive investment is ultimately sustainable. Failing to do so could lead to further declines in stock price and a significant erosion of shareholder value.

Disclaimer: This article summarizes information from the provided New York Post link and incorporates contextual knowledge. It does not constitute financial advice.