N※N

Nidec Faces Accounting Restatement After Misclassifying Contract Costs

  //stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/202 .. atement-after-misclassifying-contract-costs.html
  Published in Stocks and Investing on Friday, December 19th 2025 at 5:35 GMT by Seeking Alpha

Nidec’s Accounting Missteps and a Cooling EV Engine: Why the Investment Case Has Shattered

When the stock‑market buzz first swelled around Nidec Corp. (ticker: NIKE on the NYSE) in late‑2023, the narrative was clear: a Japanese power‑motor manufacturer was primed to ride the wave of electrification. Investors were attracted by a blend of high‑margin products, a growing portfolio of electric‑vehicle (EV) motors, and a solid financial track record that had seen earnings grow at a double‑digit pace year‑on‑year. SeekingAlpha’s recent exposé, however, has upended that narrative by laying out a two‑pronged blow to the firm’s attractiveness: a series of accounting irregularities that force a restatement of recent earnings, and a steep decline in profitability from its core EV‑related businesses.

Below is a breakdown of the key points raised in the article and the implications for anyone who was watching Nidec as a potential high‑growth investment.

1. The Accounting “Fireworks”

a. 2022‑2023 Restatement and the “Loss” of Trust

The article opens by summarizing the “restatement” announced by Nidec in March 2024. According to the company’s own filings, the firm had to correct an over‑statement of operating income in the last two fiscal years—specifically 2022 and 2023—by about ¥15 billion (roughly $140 million). The errors stemmed from an improper classification of certain “contract cost” items as revenue, a practice that violated both Japanese Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (JGAAP) and U.S. GAAP. Once the misclassification was caught, the company had to claw back the inflated earnings and issue a full restatement to its investors.

b. 2024’s “Cash Flow” Shock

Not only did the restatement require a dent in earnings, but it also had a ripple effect on cash‑flow projections. The article notes that, post‑restatement, Nidec’s free cash flow outlook for FY2024 was reduced by roughly 8 percent compared to the original guidance. That may sound modest, but in a company that had been valued at a forward‑price‑to‑earnings ratio of 22–24x in 2023, such a hit is significant.

c. Regulatory Backlash and Investor Sentiment

The piece points to a brief but intense episode of regulatory scrutiny that followed the restatement. The Tokyo Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission issued a formal warning, and the company’s board had to replace the CFO and the Head of Corporate Finance in an effort to restore confidence. Investor sentiment took a hit: Nidec’s shares fell by 18 percent in the week following the announcement, and the volatility index (VIX) for the Japanese market spiked briefly.

2. The Declining EV “Profit Engine”

a. “EV” in the Nidec Portfolio

Nidec’s core business is the manufacturing of precision motors for a wide array of industrial applications. In recent years, the company had started to carve out a niche in the electric‑vehicle sector by supplying hub‑motors, traction motors, and power‑train components to a handful of OEMs. The growth story was compelling: the EV market was projected to grow from $100 billion in 2023 to over $250 billion by 2030, and Nidec was poised to capture a share of that upside.

b. Profitability Sinks Below Expectations

The SeekingAlpha article dives into the numbers that undermined this narrative. While sales of EV‑related products did indeed rise by 9 percent year‑over‑year in FY2023, the gross margin on those products dropped from 28 percent to 21 percent—a decline that the company blamed on “intensified competition” and “increased input costs” (particularly the price of rare‑earth magnets). Moreover, the operating margin on EV products fell from 13 percent to 6 percent over the same period, essentially erasing the premium that investors had been betting on.

c. The “Demand” Slow‑Down

One of the article’s key take‑aways is that the broader EV market itself has not been as robust as expected. A link to an industry analysis (from a Bloomberg report) highlighted a slowdown in global EV sales in Q1 2024, driven by tightening monetary policy and a resurgence of gasoline‑powered vehicles in some emerging markets. Nidec’s sales pipeline had already been affected: orders from a major U.S. EV OEM were delayed by six months, and the firm’s largest customer in Europe had postponed its upcoming contract for 2025.

3. Broader Market Implications

a. “Investment Case Decimated”

The article’s headline is not an exaggeration. Combining the accounting restatement with the erosion of the EV profit engine creates a “double whammy.” The stock’s price-to-earnings ratio now sits above 35x on a forward basis—well outside the range of its peers such as Fuji Electric or Mitsubishi Electric. In practice, this means that any valuation model that previously relied on Nidec’s projected EV growth is now deeply flawed.

b. “Opportunity Cost”

SeekingAlpha’s author laments that the “investment case has decimated,” meaning that investors who had used Nidec as a proxy for the broader Japanese motor sector are now confronted with a mispriced asset. The article notes that the price drop has opened a window for “value investors” who see a potential bargain at $18–$20 per share, far below the $35–$38 range that the market had recently demanded.

c. “Comparative Outlook”

To provide context, the article links to a comparison of Nidec with its competitors. While Nidec’s EV revenue share sits at only 6 percent of total sales, competitors such as Toshiba and DENSO have been able to keep their EV margins above 20 percent by focusing on high‑end, high‑efficiency motors. This comparison underlines that Nidec’s current strategy is no longer competitive, further eroding its future upside.

4. What to Do Going Forward

The article concludes with a series of recommendations for investors who are either holding or considering adding Nidec to their portfolio:

1. Re‑evaluate the Fundamental Thesis
   – The growth narrative centered on EV motors has underperformed; shift focus to Nidec’s industrial and consumer‑electronics motor segments, which are still growing at 4–5 percent annually.

2. Watch the Restatement Trail
   – Monitor how Nidec’s new management will tighten internal controls. A clean audit in FY2024 will be crucial for restoring credibility.

3. Hold a “Risk‑Adjusted” Position
   – If you remain bullish on the Japanese motor sector, consider holding a small allocation in Nidec while diversifying across other players such as Hitachi and Mitsubishi.

4. Be Alert to Regulatory Developments
   – The company’s exposure to rare‑earth imports could become a geopolitical risk, especially if Japan faces stricter export controls.

5. Bottom Line

What once seemed like a high‑growth “EV play” has, in a matter of months, become a cautionary tale about over‑reliance on a single growth engine and the risks inherent in financial misstatement. The article’s detailed dive into accounting irregularities and declining EV profitability paints a picture of a company in distress, with an investment case that has indeed “decimated.” For investors who had built their expectations around Nidec’s supposed leadership in the EV motor space, the news forces a reassessment. Whether you view this as a buying opportunity or a wake‑up call depends on your risk tolerance and your conviction in the long‑term viability of Japan’s motor‑maker industry.