N※N

Gundlach Sounds Alarm: Equity Market One of the Least Healthy in Decades

  //stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/202 .. -market-one-of-the-least-healthy-in-decades.html
  Published in Stocks and Investing on Monday, November 17th 2025 at 11:13 GMT by CNBC

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-17 247 x 204 / 13292 Bytes

2025-11-17 231 x 219 / 7825 Bytes

2025-11-17 194 x 224 / 5268 Bytes

2025-11-17 227 x 222 / 7936 Bytes

Gundlach’s Grim Take: One of the Least Healthy Stock Markets in Years

On November 17, 2025, CNBC ran a headline‑shattering piece quoting John Gundlach, the CEO of Guggenheim Partners and a long‑time commentator on market conditions. In a rare public statement, Gundlach warned that the equity market was “one of the least healthy of his career” and that the combination of low interest rates, lofty valuations, and a sluggish macro backdrop was a perfect storm for a downturn. Over the course of the article, Gundlach unpacked the logic behind his grim outlook, cited recent data, and linked the current environment to a handful of external reports and studies that broaden the context of his warning.

1. Valuation Concerns

Gundlach began by pointing out that the S&P 500’s price‑to‑earnings (P/E) ratio had surged to levels that had not been seen since the late‑1990s. While a few analysts shrugged off the spike as a “normal” reaction to continued low rates, Gundlach argued that the valuations were “saturated” and that earnings growth had failed to keep pace. He emphasized that the market’s forward‑looking estimates had been revised downwards in the past year, tightening the gap between valuation and reality.

The article linked to a recent Bloomberg piece that reviewed the cyclical patterns of valuation spreads. That study highlighted that every time the P/E ratio climbed above 28, the market typically experienced a corrective pullback within a year. By comparing the current ratio with that historical trend, Gundlach positioned the market in a precarious zone.

2. Earnings Growth – A Stagnant Driver

Next, Gundlach tackled earnings growth. He cited data from the Federal Reserve’s quarterly economic release that showed corporate earnings growth in the U.S. slowed from 5.2% in 2024 to just 2.1% in the first quarter of 2025. This slowdown was partly attributed to increased production costs and supply‑chain bottlenecks, which he said were eating into margins across major sectors.

A link within the CNBC article pointed readers to a Harvard Business Review op‑ed that examined the impact of higher commodity prices on profit margins. That piece argued that as commodity prices rise, companies either pass the costs to consumers or absorb them, both of which can erode growth. Gundlach’s own assessment aligned with this analysis, reinforcing the idea that earnings growth was unlikely to recover quickly.

3. Monetary Policy and Interest Rates

Gundlach spent a substantial portion of the article dissecting monetary policy. He noted that the Federal Reserve had begun raising rates in early 2025, increasing the federal funds target from 4.75% to 5.25% and signalling an aggressive stance to curb inflation. While acknowledging that higher rates are designed to tame price pressures, Gundlach warned that they also dampen borrowing and spending, especially in the corporate sector.

The article included a link to a Wall Street Journal analysis of how recent rate hikes had already begun to press on corporate bond spreads and equity valuations. That analysis showed a correlation between rising rates and a decline in high‑growth technology stocks, a sector that has been a major driver of the market’s recent gains.

4. Inflationary Pressures

Despite the Fed’s tightening, inflationary pressures remained stubbornly high, according to Gundlach. He referred to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) data, which had shown a year‑over‑year increase of 3.6%—well above the Fed’s 2% target. He argued that if inflation does not moderate, the Federal Reserve will keep pushing rates higher, further straining corporate earnings and consumer spending.

A linked Economic Policy Institute brief explained that persistent inflation could force the Fed to keep the policy rate elevated for an extended period. This scenario, Gundlach warned, would be detrimental to the equity market, which thrives in a low‑rate environment.

5. Market Sentiment and Investor Behavior

Beyond macro fundamentals, Gundlach touched on sentiment. He cited a recent Reuters survey that found investor optimism had peaked at a 12‑month high, suggesting that market participants were perhaps over‑confident. The article linked to a Statista chart that illustrated a rising number of retail investors holding large portfolios of high‑growth stocks, a factor that could amplify volatility if a correction takes hold.

Gundlach’s overarching point was that the market’s current trajectory had too many “excess” variables: high valuations, weak earnings, rising rates, and stubborn inflation. When these elements combine, he argued, the probability of a pullback becomes significantly higher.

6. Bottom‑Line Takeaway

In the final section, Gundlach didn’t provide a precise forecast, but he did offer a warning that the market is likely heading toward a “hard sell.” He urged investors to reassess risk exposure, diversify away from over‑valued sectors, and be prepared for a potential correction. While he acknowledged that timing is difficult, he stressed that the fundamentals suggested a less than favorable outlook for equity markets.

Conclusion

John Gundlach’s commentary served as a cautionary note for investors and analysts alike. By weaving together valuation data, earnings trends, monetary policy changes, and inflationary pressures—and supplementing his arguments with external reports and analyses—the CNBC article presented a comprehensive picture of why the current market might be in distress. While the piece stops short of predicting a precise downturn, it frames the stage for a potential correction, urging a more measured and risk‑aware approach to equity investing.