N※N

Sensible, intellectually sharp leader: BJP, JD(U) back Shashi Tharoor as he recalls Emergency

BJP and JDU Rally Behind Shashi Tharoor's Candid Reflection on the Emergency Era

In a rare display of cross-party camaraderie, leaders from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Janata Dal (United) (JDU) have extended their support to Congress MP Shashi Tharoor following his forthright acknowledgment of the excesses during the Emergency period imposed by former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1975. Tharoor, known for his articulate and often provocative commentary on Indian politics, described the Emergency as a "dark chapter" in India's democratic history, a statement that has sparked widespread discussion and unexpectedly bridged ideological divides. This endorsement from opposition figures underscores a moment of intellectual honesty transcending partisan lines, highlighting Tharoor's reputation as a "sensible and intellectually sharp leader."

The context of Tharoor's remarks stems from the ongoing national discourse on India's political history, particularly as the country marks significant anniversaries and reflects on its democratic journey. The Emergency, declared on June 25, 1975, and lasting until March 21, 1977, remains one of the most controversial episodes in post-independence India. It was a period when civil liberties were suspended, press freedom was curtailed, and thousands of political opponents were imprisoned without trial. Indira Gandhi, then the Prime Minister and a towering figure in the Congress party, justified the move citing internal threats to national security, but it has since been widely criticized as an authoritarian overreach that undermined the foundational principles of India's Constitution.

Tharoor, representing Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala and a former United Nations diplomat, made his comments during a recent public address, where he emphasized the need for all political parties to learn from historical mistakes. "The Emergency was indeed a blot on our democracy," Tharoor reportedly said, adding that while the Congress party has evolved since then, it is crucial to confront past errors to strengthen democratic institutions. His words were not a blanket condemnation of his party but a nuanced critique, acknowledging the context of the time while stressing accountability. This balanced approach has resonated with many, including those outside the Congress fold, who see it as a sign of maturity in political dialogue.

What makes this episode particularly noteworthy is the swift and positive response from BJP and JDU leaders, parties that have historically been vocal critics of the Congress and the Gandhi family's legacy. BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra praised Tharoor, calling him a "voice of reason within the Congress" and appreciating his willingness to "speak truth to power." Patra highlighted how Tharoor's admission aligns with the BJP's long-standing narrative that the Emergency represented the "murder of democracy" by the Congress regime. "It's refreshing to see a Congress leader like Shashi Tharoor, who is intellectually sharp and sensible, openly recalling the horrors of that era," Patra stated in a media interaction. He further suggested that such acknowledgments could pave the way for a more honest national conversation about India's political past.

Echoing similar sentiments, JDU leader and Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's close aide, Rajiv Ranjan Singh (Lalan Singh), commended Tharoor for his candor. The JDU, a key ally in the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) led by the BJP, has its roots in the anti-Emergency movement, with many of its founding members having been imprisoned during that period. Singh described Tharoor as an "erudite parliamentarian" whose reflections add credibility to the discourse on democratic values. "In an age of polarized politics, it's heartening to see leaders like Tharoor rise above party lines to address historical truths," Singh remarked. This backing from the JDU is especially significant given the party's socialist leanings and its history of opposing Congress dominance.

The support for Tharoor comes at a time when Indian politics is increasingly characterized by sharp divisions, with the BJP often invoking the Emergency to criticize the Congress's commitment to democracy. For instance, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has repeatedly referenced the period in his speeches, portraying it as evidence of the Congress's authoritarian tendencies. In contrast, Congress leaders have defended Indira Gandhi's actions as necessary to counter anarchy and external threats, though some within the party, like Tharoor, have adopted a more reflective stance. Tharoor's position is not entirely new; he has previously written and spoken about the Emergency in his books and columns, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding civil liberties.

This cross-party praise has not gone unnoticed within the Congress itself. While some party insiders view Tharoor's comments as a strategic move to appeal to a broader audience, others worry it might dilute the party's narrative against the BJP's governance style, which critics accuse of similar erosions of democratic norms. Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition, has not directly commented on Tharoor's remarks, but sources close to the Congress high command suggest a mixed reaction—appreciation for intellectual honesty but caution against providing ammunition to rivals. Nonetheless, Tharoor's stature as a global thinker and his popularity on social media platforms have amplified his voice, making his statements a focal point for debate.

Beyond the immediate political reactions, Tharoor's recall of the Emergency serves as a reminder of the fragility of democratic institutions. Historians and political analysts point out that the period saw the arrest of over 100,000 people, including prominent opposition leaders like Jayaprakash Narayan, Morarji Desai, and Atal Bihari Vajpayee. The press was muzzled through censorship, and forced sterilizations under the family planning program became a symbol of state overreach. The eventual lifting of the Emergency led to the 1977 general elections, where the Congress suffered a historic defeat, paving the way for the first non-Congress government at the center.

In backing Tharoor, BJP and JDU leaders are perhaps signaling a desire for a more substantive political discourse, one that transcends mudslinging and focuses on shared democratic values. This could be seen as an olive branch in an otherwise fractious environment, especially amid ongoing tensions over issues like federalism, economic policies, and social justice. For Tharoor, this endorsement reinforces his image as a bridge-builder, someone who can engage with adversaries on intellectual grounds. His background as an author of books like "Why I Am a Hindu" and "The Paradoxical Prime Minister" has long positioned him as a thinker rather than a mere politician, and this episode only enhances that perception.

The broader implications of this development are worth pondering. In a democracy as diverse as India's, moments of consensus on historical events can foster national unity. By acknowledging the Emergency's flaws, Tharoor invites a reevaluation of how parties handle power and accountability. It also raises questions about whether other leaders will follow suit in confronting their parties' pasts—be it the BJP's role in certain communal incidents or other parties' lapses. As India approaches the 50th anniversary of the Emergency in 2025, such reflections could become more prominent, encouraging a collective introspection that strengthens the democratic fabric.

Critics, however, argue that this praise might be tactical. The BJP and JDU could be using Tharoor's words to further discredit the Congress, especially with elections on the horizon in several states. Yet, Tharoor himself has downplayed any political maneuvering, insisting that his comments are driven by a commitment to truth and learning from history. In a tweet following the endorsements, he expressed gratitude, stating, "Democracy thrives on honest dialogue, not denial. Glad to see appreciation across the aisle."

This episode, while seemingly minor, encapsulates the complexities of Indian politics—where ideology often clashes with pragmatism, and personal integrity can sometimes bridge the widest gaps. As the nation continues to grapple with its past, figures like Tharoor remind us that intellectual sharpness and sensibility are invaluable assets in the pursuit of a more robust democracy. Whether this leads to lasting cross-party understanding or remains a fleeting moment, it undoubtedly enriches the ongoing narrative of India's political evolution. (Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full The Hans India Article at:
[ https://www.thehansindia.com/news/national/sensible-intellectually-sharp-leader-bjp-jdu-back-shashi-tharoor-as-he-recalls-emergency-986977 ]