N※N

Gallagher Bill Aims to Ban Congress Stock Trading

  //stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/202 .. her-bill-aims-to-ban-congress-stock-trading.html
  Published in Stocks and Investing on Thursday, February 19th 2026 at 17:23 GMT by Fox Business
      Locales: District of Columbia, UNITED STATES

Washington D.C. - February 19th, 2026 - Representative Mike Gallagher (R-WI) ignited a fresh wave of debate on Capitol Hill today with the introduction of a comprehensive bill designed to ban stock trading by all members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children. The move, announced Thursday, represents the most ambitious attempt yet to address longstanding concerns about potential conflicts of interest, insider trading, and the erosion of public trust in government.

The bill, formally titled the "Restoring Public Trust Act," goes further than previous iterations of similar legislation. While earlier proposals often included loopholes or exemptions, Gallagher's bill mandates the complete divestment of individual stock holdings for lawmakers and their immediate families. Those currently holding such investments would be required to sell them off, ensuring compliance and eliminating the potential for future conflicts.

"For too long, Congress has operated under a different set of rules than the American people," Gallagher stated in a press release. "The ability to profit from non-public information, or even the appearance of profiting, undermines the integrity of our institutions. This bill is about leveling the playing field and holding elected officials to the same standards we expect of everyone else."

The push for restrictions on congressional stock trading isn't new. For years, ethics watchdogs and government accountability groups have highlighted instances where lawmakers appeared to benefit from privileged access to market-moving information. Reports surfacing in recent years, detailing trades made by members of Congress coinciding with legislative actions or government announcements, fueled public outrage and intensified calls for reform. While legal in many cases, these trades have raised serious questions about fairness and whether lawmakers were using their positions for personal gain.

The timing of this renewed effort is significant. A similar, though less stringent, bill passed the House earlier this month. While that legislation focused primarily on banning ownership of certain stocks, Gallagher's bill takes the bolder step of prohibiting all individual stock trading. The fact that the House passed a bill, even with limitations, signals a growing momentum towards addressing the issue. However, the path forward remains uncertain, particularly in the Senate.

The Senate is expected to present the most significant hurdle. Historically, attempts to restrict congressional trading have stalled due to bipartisan resistance. Some lawmakers argue that such restrictions infringe on their financial freedom, while others express concerns about practical implementation and the potential for unintended consequences. Lobbying efforts from groups representing financial interests are also anticipated.

Experts predict a vigorous debate in the Senate, with potential amendments likely to be offered. These could range from exemptions for certain types of investments, such as broadly diversified mutual funds or exchange-traded funds, to provisions allowing lawmakers to place their assets in blind trusts. The definition of "dependent children" is also likely to be a point of contention.

"The devil will be in the details," notes Dr. Emily Carter, a professor of political ethics at George Washington University. "While the core principle of preventing conflicts of interest is widely supported, the specifics of how this is achieved will be crucial. A bill riddled with loopholes will ultimately fail to restore public trust."

Beyond the immediate legislative implications, the debate over congressional stock trading reflects a broader conversation about government ethics and accountability. The increasing wealth and financial sophistication of lawmakers raise complex questions about the potential for corruption and the influence of money in politics. This bill, if enacted, could set a precedent for stricter ethical standards across all levels of government. Furthermore, its passage could encourage similar restrictions on the trading activities of senior government officials and appointees, further bolstering public confidence in the integrity of the administration.

The "Restoring Public Trust Act" is currently under review by relevant House committees, with a full floor vote anticipated in the coming weeks. All eyes will be on the Senate to see if this latest attempt to reform congressional trading will finally break through the gridlock and become law.