N※N

How a $1,000 Investment in IUS Would Have Grown Over 16 Years

81

  //stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/202 .. tment-in-ius-would-have-grown-over-16-years.html
  Published in Stocks and Investing on Monday, November 24th 2025 at 11:05 GMT by The Motley Fool

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-24 230 x 219 / 6802 Bytes

2025-11-24 229 x 220 / 5657 Bytes

2025-11-24 179 x 224 / 10170 Bytes

2025-11-24 179 x 224 / 12137 Bytes

A Look Back at the iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF – What a $1,000 Investment Would Have Looked Like

The Motley Fool’s “If You’d Invested $1,000 in the iShares Core S&P Total” series of posts consistently aim to put the abstract numbers of the market into a concrete, human‑sized frame of reference. In this latest entry, the writers walk readers through the performance of the iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ticker: IUS – note: the actual ticker used in the article is iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF). They do so by tracing a hypothetical $1,000 investment from its first day in the fund (January 2009) to the article’s publish date, 24 November 2025. The piece is designed for anyone who wants to see how a low‑cost, broadly diversified ETF would have stacked up against the broader equity market and other common benchmarks over a 16‑year horizon.

1. The Big Picture: What IUS Is All About

At the core of the article is a clear explanation of the ETF’s purpose: to track the S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index. That index is a composite of roughly 4,000 stocks that covers large, mid‑, small‑, and even micro‑cap companies across all sectors of the U.S. equity universe. Because it mirrors the entire domestic market, the ETF is often marketed as a “one‑stop shop” for U.S. equity exposure.

The writers break down the ETF’s asset allocation by market cap segment (large cap ≈ 60 %, mid‑cap ≈ 25 %, small‑cap ≈ 15 %) and by sector (technology, consumer discretionary, healthcare, industrials, financials, utilities, etc.). They also note that the fund’s holdings change only on a quarterly basis, so investors get a fairly stable, “hands‑off” representation of the market’s movements.

2. Cost Matters: Expense Ratio and Tax Efficiency

A key part of the discussion is the fund’s expense ratio, which the article cites at 0.04 %. This is notably cheaper than many actively managed alternatives and sits on par with, or slightly below, Vanguard’s Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 0.03 %. The writers emphasize that over long periods, the compounding effect of lower fees can have a sizable impact on returns.

They also touch on the fund’s tax efficiency. Because iShares ETFs use the “in‑kind” creation/redemption mechanism to manage capital gains, investors can expect relatively low taxable events compared with mutual funds. The article references IRS Form 1099‑DTS for those who want the exact numbers on dividends and capital gains distributions.

3. Performance Over Time: The $1,000 Story

This is the meat of the post. The writers set up a table that shows the cumulative return of the $1,000 investment over each year, as well as the final value as of 24 November 2025. The performance is compared side‑by‑side with the S&P 500 index (a 500‑company subset) and a “market‑average” portfolio that blends the iShares Core S&P Total with the iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) in a 60/40 split.

Key highlights include:

The figures show that the IUS outperformed both the S&P 500 and the 60/40 blend by roughly 4–5 % over the entire period. The article attributes this edge primarily to the additional exposure to small‑cap and mid‑cap stocks, which historically generate higher long‑term growth than large caps alone. It also notes that the ETF’s low cost helped preserve a larger slice of that growth.

The writers point out that a one‑year look can be deceiving; in 2020, for instance, IUS posted a 15 % gain while the S&P 500 posted 14.5 %. But over a longer horizon the extra diversification and lower fees consistently tipped the balance.

4. Risk and Volatility

The article goes on to address the volatility trade‑off. Using standard deviation metrics, the authors show that IUS’s annualized volatility over the 2009‑2025 period hovered around 17 %, compared with 15 % for the S&P 500 and 12 % for the 60/40 blend. This higher volatility is a consequence of the ETF’s small‑cap exposure, which tends to swing more wildly in turbulent markets.

To put it in context, the article includes a chart that overlays the fund’s Sharpe ratio (return per unit of risk) with that of the S&P 500. The Sharpe ratio for IUS sits just above 0.4, a modest improvement over the S&P 500’s 0.38. The writers caution that risk‑averse investors might prefer the lower volatility of the 60/40 blend, while growth‑oriented investors may be willing to accept the extra swings for the potential upside.

5. Where the Link Goes – Additional Context

The authors embed several hyperlinks to deepen the reader’s understanding:

1. iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (IUS) – Official Fact Sheet – provides the most recent holdings list, sector weights, and expense ratio details.

2. Morningstar – IUS Rating & Analyst Report – gives an independent evaluation of the ETF’s performance relative to its peers.

3. SEC – 13F Filing for iShares – lets sophisticated readers see how the ETF’s holdings are reported in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s database.

4. Motley Fool – “If You’d Invested $1,000 in the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF” – a sibling article that offers a side‑by‑side comparison of two leading total‑market ETFs.

The article also references the ETF’s performance data for each year in the “Year‑by‑Year Performance” section, linking directly to the iShares website where the raw NAV and dividend data can be downloaded.

6. Bottom‑Line Takeaways

The post ends with a concise “Bottom‑Line Takeaways” section that summarizes the key points for the average reader:

• Broad Diversification: IUS covers the entire U.S. equity market, offering exposure to all cap sizes and sectors.
• Low Cost: The 0.04 % expense ratio keeps a larger portion of returns in the portfolio.
• Historical Outperformance: Over a 16‑year period, IUS outperformed both the S&P 500 and a conventional 60/40 blend by a small but meaningful margin.
• Higher Volatility: The fund’s small‑cap tilt adds a bit more risk, reflected in higher annualized volatility.
• Tax Efficiency: The ETF’s structure helps minimize capital gains distributions, making it attractive for tax‑advantaged accounts.

The writers conclude that, for investors who want a “set‑and‑forget” exposure to the full U.S. stock market at a low cost, the iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF is a compelling choice—especially if you’re comfortable with the small‑cap risk premium it offers.

7. Final Thoughts

This article exemplifies the Motley Fool’s knack for demystifying complex financial products through relatable, concrete examples. By anchoring the discussion around a $1,000 investment that has grown over 16 years, the writers let readers visualize the practical implications of fees, diversification, and risk. The inclusion of hyperlinks to official documents and independent analyses gives the piece a solid depth, allowing curious readers to dig deeper if they wish.

Whether you’re a new investor looking for a low‑cost, broadly diversified ETF or an experienced portfolio manager comparing tickers, the article provides a useful snapshot of how the iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF has performed historically and how it stacks up against other options in the market.