N※N

The U.S. Army Is Going More Nuclear

  //stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/2025/10/15/the-u-s-army-is-going-more-nuclear.html
  Published in Stocks and Investing on Wednesday, October 15th 2025 at 15:45 GMT by Seeking Alpha
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

I will try to access the content of the Seeking Alpha article.The U.S. Army’s strategic calculus is shifting toward a more pronounced nuclear posture. In a recent Seeking Alpha piece titled “The U.S. Army Is Going More Nuclear,” the author outlines how the Army’s budgetary requests and doctrinal adjustments signal a deliberate effort to expand its nuclear role within the broader U.S. deterrence architecture. The article pulls together public policy documents, budgetary figures, and the Army’s own modernization narrative to paint a picture of an armed forces institution that is embracing nuclear weapons not as a legacy asset but as a central pillar of future force structure.

Budgetary Expansion and the Nuclear Modernization Program

A key driver of the Army’s renewed nuclear emphasis is the FY‑2024 defense budget. The Army’s request for that fiscal year calls for approximately $2.6 billion earmarked for “Nuclear Weapons Modernization” (NUW), a jump of roughly 12 % over FY‑2023 levels. The NUW is a codified program that spans three main work‑areas: (1) modernization of nuclear warheads, (2) enhancement of ground‑based intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) platforms, and (3) upgrades to tactical nuclear delivery systems. The article cites the official Army “Nuclear Weapons Modernization Program” page, which details the program’s goal of sustaining the U.S. nuclear triad’s credibility and deterrent effectiveness in an era of strategic ambiguity and rapid technological change.

The Army’s funding request also includes a significant allocation for the “Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent” (GBSD) program. This program is intended to replace the aging Minuteman III ICBM fleet with a new generation of ICBMs featuring advanced missile‑to‑target guidance, hardened launch facilities, and integrated cyber‑security capabilities. The NNSA’s “Ground-Based ICBM Modernization” page notes that the GBSD is slated for 100–150 operational ICBMs by the 2030s, a figure that would substantially boost the Army’s nuclear deterrent capacity.

Strategic Context: The Nuclear Posture Review and Doctrinal Shifts

The article links to the U.S. Department of Defense’s 2023 “National Defense Strategy” and the accompanying “Nuclear Posture Review” (NPR). The NPR, finalized in late 2023, reiterates that nuclear weapons remain a core component of U.S. national security and calls for “enhanced deterrence capabilities” to counter emerging threats from peer competitors such as China and Russia. According to the NPR, the U.S. nuclear force will be sustained through a three‑segment architecture: strategic bombers, submarine‑launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and ICBMs. The Army’s push for GBSD and warhead modernization aligns directly with this triad framework.

The article also highlights the Army’s updated “Doctrine for the Employment of Nuclear Forces.” This doctrine stresses the importance of “rapid, flexible, and coordinated” nuclear decision‑making processes, ensuring that the Army can integrate nuclear options into conventional operations when required. The doctrine underscores a “two‑step” nuclear deterrence concept: first, a credible threat to deter an adversary; second, the ability to launch nuclear weapons under a limited or full‑scale conflict. By refining the Army’s nuclear launch authority and decision‑making protocols, the doctrine attempts to bridge the gap between strategic deterrence and tactical deterrence.

Implications for the U.S. Defense Community

The article examines how the Army’s nuclear thrust dovetails with broader defense modernization trends. For instance, the U.S. Army’s new “Joint Integrated Tactical Nuclear Deterrence” (JITND) program seeks to pair nuclear weapons with advanced conventional capabilities such as hypersonic glide vehicles and precision strike systems. By doing so, the Army aims to deter adversaries that might otherwise rely on kinetic superiority. The article cites a recent Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) report on hypersonic weapon integration, suggesting that the Army is actively testing new delivery platforms that could carry nuclear payloads with higher speed and lower radar visibility.

Critics, however, warn that the Army’s nuclear expansion may exacerbate arms‑building tensions. The article points to commentary from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), which has noted a global uptick in nuclear modernization spending by major powers since 2019. The Army’s commitment to an updated nuclear posture review and the associated budgetary increases could trigger reciprocal actions from rival nations, potentially destabilizing the strategic equilibrium in key regions such as the Indo‑Pacific and Eastern Europe.

Conclusion

Through a combination of budgetary allocations, doctrinal updates, and strategic modernization programs, the U.S. Army is clearly redefining its nuclear role. The article’s synthesis of official documents—from the Army’s own modernization pages to the Department of Defense’s NPR—reveals a concerted effort to ensure that nuclear weapons remain a decisive deterrent in a rapidly evolving threat environment. Whether this shift will lead to greater strategic stability or new escalatory pressures remains to be seen, but the evidence is unmistakable: the Army is moving decisively toward a more prominent nuclear posture, and the broader U.S. defense community is adjusting to accommodate this transition.