N※N

Show Stocks and Investing Publications

India to Maintain Voting Cap in Public Banks Amid Foreign Investment Review

Centre Likely to Retain 10% Voting Cap in Public Sector Banks Amid Foreign Investment Review

In a move that underscores the Indian government's cautious approach to financial sector reforms, the Centre is reportedly considering maintaining the existing 10% voting rights cap in public sector banks (PSBs), even as it undertakes a broader review of foreign investment norms. This decision comes at a time when the banking landscape in India is evolving rapidly, with increasing calls for liberalization to attract global capital and enhance efficiency. However, the government's priority appears to be safeguarding strategic control over these institutions, which play a pivotal role in the country's economic framework.

The voting rights cap, a longstanding regulatory feature in India's banking sector, limits any single shareholder—domestic or foreign—from exercising more than 10% of the voting power in a PSB, regardless of their actual shareholding percentage. This mechanism ensures that the government, as the majority stakeholder in most PSBs, retains dominant influence over key decisions such as board appointments, strategic directions, and policy implementations. Sources familiar with the matter indicate that while the government is open to easing foreign direct investment (FDI) limits to encourage overseas participation, it is wary of diluting this cap, which could potentially lead to undue foreign influence in entities that handle a significant portion of India's savings and credit disbursement.

This stance is particularly relevant in the context of the ongoing review of foreign investment policies in the banking sector. The review, initiated by the Department of Financial Services under the Ministry of Finance, aims to align India's regulations with global best practices while addressing domestic economic needs. Currently, FDI in private sector banks is permitted up to 74% under the automatic route, but for PSBs, foreign investment is capped at 20% and requires government approval. The review could potentially raise this FDI ceiling for PSBs, making them more attractive to international investors who have shown interest in India's growing digital economy and financial inclusion initiatives. However, retaining the 10% voting cap would act as a safeguard, preventing any foreign entity from gaining disproportionate control even if their equity stake increases.

Experts argue that this balanced approach reflects the government's dual objectives: fostering capital inflows to strengthen bank balance sheets and maintaining sovereignty over public assets. PSBs in India, including giants like State Bank of India (SBI), Punjab National Bank (PNB), and Bank of Baroda, manage over 60% of the country's banking assets. These institutions have been instrumental in implementing government schemes such as Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana for financial inclusion and Mudra loans for micro-enterprises. Any shift in control could impact the execution of such programs, which are often aligned with national priorities rather than purely commercial interests.

The discussion around voting rights and foreign investment has gained momentum following recent global trends. For instance, in markets like the United States and Europe, foreign investors often hold significant stakes in banks without voting caps, but with stringent regulatory oversight. In contrast, India's model draws from a legacy of nationalization in the 1970s, when banks were brought under public control to serve developmental goals. Lifting the voting cap entirely could invite risks similar to those seen in other emerging markets, where foreign dominance has sometimes led to asset stripping or volatility during economic downturns.

Government officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, have emphasized that the review is not about privatization per se but about optimizing capital structures. The Economic Survey of 2023-24 highlighted the need for PSBs to improve governance and efficiency, suggesting that higher foreign investment could bring in best practices in risk management and technology. Yet, the 10% cap ensures that such benefits do not come at the cost of losing oversight. This is especially pertinent amid ongoing recapitalization efforts, where the government has infused over Rs 3.5 lakh crore into PSBs since 2017 to address non-performing assets (NPAs) stemming from legacy lending issues.

Industry analysts point out that retaining the cap could have mixed implications. On the positive side, it reassures domestic stakeholders and maintains stability in a sector that has weathered crises like the 2008 global financial meltdown and the COVID-19 pandemic. PSBs have been key lenders during economic recoveries, often at the behest of the government, which might not align with profit-maximizing foreign investors. For example, during the pandemic, PSBs extended moratoriums and emergency credit lines, absorbing losses that private banks were more selective about.

However, critics argue that the cap might deter high-quality foreign investors who seek commensurate influence with their investments. In a globalized economy, banks like HSBC or Standard Chartered have successfully operated in India with minority stakes, but scaling up could require more skin in the game. Without relaxing the voting limit, PSBs might struggle to compete with nimble private players like HDFC Bank or ICICI Bank, which have leveraged foreign capital to expand digitally and internationally.

The review process is expected to involve consultations with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which has historically advocated for prudent regulations. The RBI's guidelines under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, already impose fit-and-proper criteria for shareholders exceeding certain thresholds, adding another layer of scrutiny. If the government proceeds with retaining the cap, it could propose alternatives like allowing higher non-voting shares or convertible instruments to attract FDI without compromising control.

This development also ties into broader economic reforms under the Narendra Modi administration, which has pursued initiatives like the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to resolve stressed assets and the merger of PSBs to create larger entities. The consolidation of 10 PSBs into four in 2020 aimed at building scale, but challenges persist in terms of profitability and market valuation. For instance, the market capitalization of PSBs lags behind private counterparts, partly due to perceived government interference.

Looking ahead, the outcome of this review could influence investor sentiment in the run-up to the Union Budget. With India's economy projected to grow at 7% in FY25, robust banking support is crucial. If the 10% cap is retained, it might signal a preference for gradualism over radical change, aligning with the 'Atmanirbhar Bharat' self-reliance narrative. Conversely, any relaxation could open doors to strategic partnerships, potentially with investors from the Middle East or Asia, who are eyeing India's fintech boom.

In conclusion, the Centre's potential decision to keep the 10% voting cap in PSBs amid the foreign investment review highlights a strategic balancing act. It prioritizes national control while exploring avenues for growth, ensuring that public banks remain pillars of economic stability. As discussions progress, stakeholders will watch closely for how this evolves, potentially shaping the future trajectory of India's banking sector in an increasingly interconnected world. This approach not only protects against external vulnerabilities but also reinforces the role of PSBs in driving inclusive development. (Word count: 928)

Read the Full moneycontrol.com Article at:
[ https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/centre-may-retain-10-voting-cap-in-psbs-despite-foreign-investment-review-report-13324375.html ]