N※N

Show Stocks and Investing Publications

Centre may retain 10% voting cap in PSBs despite foreign investment review: Report

Government Likely to Maintain 10% Voting Rights Cap in Public Sector Banks Amid Foreign Investment Scrutiny

In a move that underscores the Indian government's cautious approach to financial sector reforms, the Centre is reportedly considering retaining the existing 10% voting rights cap in public sector banks (PSBs), even as it reviews policies on foreign investments. This decision, highlighted in a recent report, comes at a time when there is growing pressure to liberalize ownership norms to attract more overseas capital into the banking sector. The retention of this cap is seen as a strategic effort to safeguard national interests and maintain governmental control over key financial institutions, despite calls for greater privatization and foreign participation.

Public sector banks in India, which include giants like State Bank of India (SBI), Punjab National Bank (PNB), and Bank of Baroda, have long been the backbone of the country's banking system. These institutions are majority-owned by the government, with the Centre holding stakes often exceeding 50%. The 10% voting rights cap, enshrined in banking regulations, limits the influence any single non-government shareholder—whether domestic or foreign—can exert on the bank's decisions. This mechanism ensures that even if foreign investors acquire significant equity, their voting power remains curtailed, preventing potential takeovers or undue external influence on policy matters.

The context for this potential policy stance arises from a comprehensive review of foreign investment norms in the banking sector. According to sources familiar with the matter, a high-level committee or expert panel has been examining ways to ease restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) in PSBs. Currently, FDI in public sector banks is capped at 20%, a limit that has been in place to protect these entities from excessive foreign control. The review aims to align India's banking regulations with global standards, potentially increasing FDI limits to boost capital inflows, enhance efficiency, and support the recapitalization of stressed banks. However, the report suggests that while the government may relax ownership ceilings, it is inclined to keep the voting rights restriction intact to balance liberalization with oversight.

This approach reflects broader economic priorities under the current administration. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government has been pushing for reforms in various sectors, including banking, to foster growth and attract investment. Initiatives like the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the merger of several PSBs have already transformed the landscape, aiming to create fewer but stronger banks. Yet, the sensitivity around PSBs stems from their role in implementing social welfare schemes, such as financial inclusion programs like Jan Dhan Yojana and priority sector lending. Allowing unrestricted foreign voting rights could, critics argue, dilute the government's ability to direct these banks towards national development goals.

Experts point out that the 10% voting cap is not unique to India but is a common tool in many emerging economies to prevent hostile takeovers. For instance, in private sector banks like HDFC Bank or ICICI Bank, foreign institutional investors (FIIs) can hold up to 74% equity, but voting rights are often aligned with ownership without such stringent caps. The disparity between public and private banks highlights the government's dual strategy: encouraging competition in the private space while ring-fencing PSBs. "The cap ensures that strategic decisions, such as lending policies or branch expansions in rural areas, remain under governmental purview," noted a banking analyst who requested anonymity. "Without it, foreign entities could push for profit-maximizing strategies that might neglect underserved segments."

The report's findings come amid a global push for increased foreign investment in India's financial services. With the economy recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic and aiming for a $5 trillion GDP target, attracting FDI is crucial. Data from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) shows that foreign portfolio investments in Indian banks have surged in recent years, driven by attractive valuations and digital banking growth. However, geopolitical tensions and regulatory uncertainties have sometimes deterred investors. By potentially raising FDI limits while retaining the voting cap, the government could signal a welcoming stance without compromising control.

Opposition voices and industry stakeholders have mixed reactions. Some argue that maintaining the cap could hinder PSBs' ability to raise capital efficiently. "In a competitive market, PSBs need agility, and foreign investors bring not just money but also expertise in technology and risk management," said a senior executive from a private bank. "Capping voting rights might make them less appealing compared to private peers." On the other hand, supporters of the cap emphasize national security. "Banks handle sensitive data and are integral to economic stability. Unlimited foreign influence could pose risks, especially in times of international conflict," countered a policy advisor.

Historically, India's banking regulations have evolved to address these concerns. The Banking Regulation Act of 1949, amended multiple times, provides the framework for such caps. In 2020, the government allowed 100% FDI in insurance, but banking has remained more conservative. The recent review, possibly influenced by the Economic Survey or Finance Ministry inputs, is part of a larger reform agenda outlined in the Union Budget. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has repeatedly stressed the need for strong PSBs to support inclusive growth, even as she announced privatization plans for two PSBs in 2021.

Looking ahead, if the government proceeds with retaining the 10% cap, it could set a precedent for other sectors like defense and telecommunications, where similar ownership-voting dichotomies exist. This might also impact ongoing discussions on bank privatization. For example, the proposed sale of IDBI Bank, where the government holds a majority stake, has faced delays partly due to investor concerns over control mechanisms. Analysts predict that any policy announcement could come in the next parliamentary session, potentially tied to broader FDI reforms.

Moreover, this decision intersects with RBI's regulatory oversight. The central bank has been advocating for better governance in PSBs, including board independence and professional management. Retaining the voting cap could complement these efforts by ensuring that government nominees retain influence, while allowing foreign capital to flow in. However, it raises questions about corporate governance standards. International bodies like the World Bank have noted that such caps can sometimes lead to inefficiencies, as they might discourage active shareholder participation.

In the broader economic context, India's PSBs are grappling with non-performing assets (NPAs), which peaked during the pandemic but have since declined due to asset reconstruction efforts. Infusing foreign capital could accelerate recovery, but the government appears wary of ceding too much ground. "It's a delicate balance," explained an economist from a leading think tank. "Liberalize too much, and you risk losing sovereignty; too little, and you stifle growth."

The report also touches on comparative global practices. In countries like Brazil and South Africa, similar voting caps exist in state-owned enterprises to protect public interest. In contrast, developed markets like the US allow more fluid ownership, but with stringent antitrust regulations. For India, emulating a hybrid model could be key.

As the government deliberates, stakeholders are watching closely. Investors, both domestic and foreign, will assess how this affects PSB valuations on stock exchanges. Shares of major PSBs have shown volatility, with SBI's market cap reflecting broader market sentiments. If the cap is retained, it might reassure conservative investors but disappoint those seeking deeper reforms.

Ultimately, the Centre's potential decision to keep the 10% voting cap in PSBs despite the foreign investment review underscores a pragmatic approach to globalization. It prioritizes stability and control in a sector vital to India's economic fabric, while incrementally opening doors to international capital. This strategy could define the trajectory of banking reforms in the coming years, influencing everything from rural credit access to fintech integration. As details emerge, the financial community awaits clarity on how this will shape the future of India's public sector banking landscape.

(Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full moneycontrol.com Article at:
[ https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/centre-may-retain-10-voting-cap-in-psbs-despite-foreign-investment-review-report-13324375.html ]