Stocks & Investing
Tue, August 12, 2025
[ Today @ 05:59 AM ]: Orlando Sentinel
[ Today @ 05:59 AM ]: Business Insider
[ Today @ 05:58 AM ]: dpa international
[ Today @ 04:57 AM ]: Reuters
[ Today @ 04:10 AM ]: WOPRAI
[ Today @ 04:02 AM ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Today @ 04:01 AM ]: The Motley Fool
[ Today @ 04:00 AM ]: Fortune
[ Today @ 02:06 AM ]: Investopedia
Mon, August 11, 2025
[ Yesterday Evening ]: Bloomberg L.P.
[ Yesterday Evening ]: The Financial Express
[ Yesterday Evening ]: RTE Online
[ Yesterday Evening ]: investorplace.com
[ Yesterday Evening ]: USA TODAY
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Kiplinger
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: The Motley Fool
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: SB Nation
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Finbold | Finance in Bold
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Fortune
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Investopedia
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Reading Eagle, Pa.
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: WMUR
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: WOPRAI
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Courier-Journal
[ Yesterday Morning ]: BBC
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Forbes
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Yesterday Morning ]: socastsrm.com
[ Yesterday Morning ]: WFTV
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Business Today
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Globe and Mail
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Zee Business
[ Yesterday Morning ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Yesterday Morning ]: 24/7 Wall St
Sun, August 10, 2025
[ Last Sunday ]: federalnewsnetwork.com
[ Last Sunday ]: Forbes
[ Last Sunday ]: investorplace.com
[ Last Sunday ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Last Sunday ]: Investopedia
[ Last Sunday ]: The Financial Express
[ Last Sunday ]: Seeking Alpha
Sat, August 9, 2025
[ Last Saturday ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Last Saturday ]: CoinTelegraph
[ Last Saturday ]: Free Malaysia Today
[ Last Saturday ]: Variety
[ Last Saturday ]: WMBD Peoria
[ Last Saturday ]: The Financial Express
[ Last Saturday ]: Reuters
[ Last Saturday ]: syracuse.com
[ Last Saturday ]: The Straits Times
[ Last Saturday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Saturday ]: New Hampshire Union Leader
[ Last Saturday ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Last Saturday ]: Rolling Out
[ Last Saturday ]: Finbold | Finance in Bold
[ Last Saturday ]: Seeking Alpha
Fri, August 8, 2025
[ Last Friday ]: 24/7 Wall St
[ Last Friday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Friday ]: Investopedia
[ Last Friday ]: socastsrm.com
[ Last Friday ]: The Raw Story
[ Last Friday ]: USA TODAY
[ Last Friday ]: Finbold | Finance in Bold
[ Last Friday ]: fingerlakes1
[ Last Friday ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Last Friday ]: cryptonewsz
[ Last Friday ]: WOPRAI
Thu, August 7, 2025
[ Last Thursday ]: WOPRAI
Wed, August 6, 2025
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Financial Express
[ Last Wednesday ]: The New York Times
[ Last Wednesday ]: reuters.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: WSB-TV
[ Last Wednesday ]: Forbes
[ Last Wednesday ]: Boston.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Straits Times
[ Last Wednesday ]: Kiplinger
[ Last Wednesday ]: Bloomberg L.P.
[ Last Wednesday ]: Business Insider
[ Last Wednesday ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Last Wednesday ]: Investopedia
[ Last Wednesday ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: New York Post
[ Last Wednesday ]: RTE Online
[ Last Wednesday ]: Channel NewsAsia Singapore
[ Last Wednesday ]: Business Today
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Wednesday ]: WOPRAI
Tue, August 5, 2025
[ Last Tuesday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Tuesday ]: WOPRAI
[ Last Tuesday ]: The Jerusalem Post Blogs
[ Last Tuesday ]: Fox Business
[ Last Tuesday ]: Forbes
[ Last Tuesday ]: RTE Online
[ Last Tuesday ]: The Globe and Mail
[ Last Tuesday ]: fingerlakes1
[ Last Tuesday ]: BBC
[ Last Tuesday ]: Finbold | Finance in Bold
[ Last Tuesday ]: Investopedia
[ Tue, Aug 05th ]: Reuters
[ Tue, Aug 05th ]: Bloomberg L.P.
[ Tue, Aug 05th ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Tue, Aug 05th ]: The Financial Express
[ Tue, Aug 05th ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Tue, Aug 05th ]: The Citizen
[ Tue, Aug 05th ]: The New York Times
Mon, August 4, 2025
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: KMID Midland
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: legit
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: WOPRAI
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Fortune
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Associated Press
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: investorplace.com
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: PC Magazine
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Investopedia
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: reuters.com
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: USA TODAY
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: The Motley Fool
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Finbold | Finance in Bold
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Forbes
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Barron's
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: The Financial Express
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Business Today
Sun, August 3, 2025
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Fox Weather
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: ESPN
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: People
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: The Motley Fool
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: WGME
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Toronto Star
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Jets Wire
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Forbes
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Bills Wire
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: news4sanantonio
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Fox 11 News
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Local 12 WKRC Cincinnati
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Investopedia
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: USA TODAY
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Impacts
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: wjla
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: CoinTelegraph
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Business Today
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: TheNewsCenter
Sat, August 2, 2025
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Fortune
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Forbes
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: RepublicWorld
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Kiplinger
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Business Today
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: fingerlakes1
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: FXStreet
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: The Daily Star
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: The Motley Fool
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Investopedia
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Zee Business
Fri, August 1, 2025
[ Fri, Aug 01st ]: WOPRAI
Thu, July 31, 2025
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: KUTV
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: Ravens Wire
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: reuters.com
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: WOPRAI
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: MarketWatch
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: USA TODAY
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: Investopedia
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: Forbes
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: The Motley Fool
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: Channel NewsAsia Singapore
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: The New York Times
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: 24/7 Wall St
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: U.S. News Money
Wed, July 30, 2025
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Business Today
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: 24/7 Wall St
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: The Hill
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: HuffPost
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Local 12 WKRC Cincinnati
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: The New York Times
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: reuters.com
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Robb Report
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Forbes
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: The Motley Fool
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: New Hampshire Union Leader
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Investopedia
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Fortune
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: fingerlakes1
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: Kiplinger
[ Wed, Jul 30th ]: moneycontrol.com
Editorial: Ban stock trading by members of Congress
//stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/202 .. al-ban-stock-trading-by-members-of-congress.html
Published in Stocks and Investing on Tuesday, August 12th 2025 at 5:59 GMT by Orlando Sentinel🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
Some people enter politics to do good, others to do well. The difference is more than semantic. The do-gooders care about real issues like public health, education and the environment. They might look at the stock market to tell how the economy is doing. The other kind may check their portfolios several times a day to see how their own are doing. They sometimes confuse the national ...
Editorial: It's Time to Ban Stock Trading by Members of Congress
In the halls of American power, where decisions shape the economy and influence markets, a persistent ethical dilemma has long simmered: Should members of Congress be allowed to trade individual stocks while in office? This editorial argues unequivocally that the answer is no. The potential for conflicts of interest, insider trading, and the erosion of public trust in government is too great to ignore. A comprehensive ban on stock trading by lawmakers, their spouses, and senior staff is not just advisable—it's essential for restoring integrity to our democratic institutions.
The issue gained renewed urgency in recent years amid high-profile scandals and investigations. Consider the case of several senators who sold off stocks in early 2020, just as the COVID-19 pandemic was emerging, after receiving classified briefings on the virus's potential impact. While no charges were ultimately filed, the optics were damning. These lawmakers, privy to non-public information that could move markets, appeared to profit—or at least avoid losses—at a time when ordinary Americans were blindsided by economic turmoil. Such incidents aren't isolated; data from watchdog groups like Unusual Whales and the Campaign Legal Center reveal that members of Congress consistently outperform the market, raising suspicions of unfair advantages.
At its core, the problem stems from the unique position of legislators. Congress members sit on committees that oversee industries ranging from defense and technology to healthcare and finance. They draft laws, approve mergers, and allocate trillions in federal spending—actions that can directly affect stock prices. For instance, a senator on the Armed Services Committee might learn about upcoming defense contracts before the public, potentially using that knowledge to buy or sell related stocks. Even if no explicit insider trading occurs, the mere appearance of impropriety undermines faith in government. A 2022 poll by the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy found that over 70% of Americans believe members of Congress use inside information for personal gain, contributing to historically low approval ratings for the legislative branch.
Opponents of a ban often argue that lawmakers should have the same financial freedoms as other citizens. They claim that blind trusts or disclosure requirements, as mandated by the 2012 STOCK Act, provide sufficient safeguards. The STOCK Act requires timely reporting of trades and prohibits the use of non-public information, but enforcement has been lax. Penalties are minimal, and the law doesn't prevent trading altogether. Critics point out that blind trusts aren't foolproof; lawmakers could still influence trustees indirectly. Moreover, spouses and dependents aren't always covered, creating loopholes. Take the example of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, whose well-timed trades in tech stocks have drawn scrutiny, even though no wrongdoing was proven. These cases highlight how current rules fail to eliminate conflicts.
Proponents of a ban, including bipartisan figures like Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Steve Daines (R-MT), have introduced legislation such as the Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act. This bill would require members to divest individual stocks or place them in blind trusts, with strict prohibitions on trading during their tenure. Similar measures have been proposed in the House, gaining support from progressives and conservatives alike. The rationale is straightforward: Public service should prioritize the common good over personal enrichment. Lawmakers already earn salaries well above the national average—around $174,000 annually—plus pensions and benefits. Allowing them to trade stocks invites corruption, real or perceived, and distracts from their duties.
Historical context adds weight to the argument. Insider trading scandals aren't new; in the 1980s, the Ivan Boesky case exposed Wall Street's underbelly, leading to stricter regulations for the private sector. Yet Congress has been slow to apply the same standards to itself. The Supreme Court has ruled that lawmakers enjoy certain immunities, but that shouldn't extend to financial self-dealing. Internationally, countries like the United Kingdom and Canada impose restrictions on parliamentary stock trading, recognizing the inherent risks. The U.S. could learn from these models, implementing a ban with clear enforcement mechanisms, such as independent oversight by the Office of Government Ethics.
Beyond ethics, there's an economic fairness angle. When Congress members trade on privileged information, it exacerbates wealth inequality. The stock market becomes a rigged game, where elites with access to Capitol Hill whispers gain an edge over everyday investors saving for retirement. This disparity fuels populism and cynicism, as seen in movements like Occupy Wall Street or the rise of anti-establishment politics. A ban would level the playing field, signaling that no one is above the law—not even those who write it.
Implementation wouldn't be without challenges. Lawmakers with existing portfolios would need time to divest, perhaps through diversified mutual funds or index funds, which don't pose the same conflict risks. Exemptions could be made for holdings unrelated to their committee work, but a blanket ban is preferable to avoid gray areas. Enforcement could involve mandatory audits and severe penalties, including fines or expulsion from office, to deter violations.
Critics might decry this as government overreach, infringing on personal liberties. But serving in Congress is a privilege, not a right, and it comes with sacrifices. Pilots can't fly drunk; judges can't accept gifts from litigants. Why should politicians be allowed to gamble on stocks they regulate? The public's trust is at stake, and with midterm elections looming, voters are watching. Polling shows overwhelming bipartisan support for a ban—over 80% in some surveys—transcending party lines.
In conclusion, banning stock trading by members of Congress is a commonsense reform overdue for action. It would curb corruption, enhance transparency, and reaffirm that elected officials serve the people, not their portfolios. As the nation grapples with economic uncertainty, from inflation to supply chain disruptions, lawmakers must lead by example. Passing such legislation would be a step toward a more equitable and trustworthy government. The time for half-measures is over; a full ban is the path forward. (Word count: 912)
Read the Full Orlando Sentinel Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/editorial-ban-stock-trading-members-093000262.html ]
